THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM G. HERBERT, LOREN E. HENDRIX,
GARY J. MAIER and ERNEST F. MATYI
____________
Appeal No. 95-2930
Application No. 08/043,9531
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, CAROFF and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Herbert et al. (appellants) appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 37 through 45 which are all of the
claims remaining in the application.
Claim 37 is representative of the subject matter on
appeal and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed April 5, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007