THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 63
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PAUL MC MAHON, TAI-SHUNG CHUNG
and LINCOLN YING
____________
Appeal No. 95-3094
Application No. 07/975,1411
____________
HEARD: June 11, 1999
____________
Before WINTERS, METZ, and JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed November 12, 1992.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/657,348, filed February 15, 1991; which is
continuation of Application No. 06/770,376, filed August 29,
1985; which is a continuation of Application No. 06/589,825,
filed March 15, 1984.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007