THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHARLES W. GOMEZ and STEVEN R. AUSTIN
____________
Appeal No. 95-3110
Application No. 08/183,0581
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Gomez et al. (appellants) appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 through 9. Claims 15 through 21
and 28 through 34 are no longer the subject of this appeal
since appellants withdrew the appeal of the rejection of
1Application for patent filed January 18, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007