THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte
TSE W. CHANG
__________
Appeal No. 1995-3148
1
Application 08/011,130
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 6 and 8
through 14, all the claims pending in the application. Claims 6, 8, 11 and 13 are
representative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows:
Application for patent filed January 28, 1993. According to appellant, this application is a1
continuation-in-part of Application 07/926,566, filed August 6, 1992, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of 07/688,000, filed April 19, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007