THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte EDWARD E. LAFLEUR, WILLIAM J. WORK,
ROBERT M. AMICI, NEWMAN M. BORTNICK and NORMAN L. HOLY
________________
Appeal No. 95-3201
Application No. 08/083,9571
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed June 25, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/929,878, filed August 11, 1992, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007