Ex parte GORDON et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1995-3249                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 07/670,644                                                                                                             


                 E.J. Perkins et al. (Perkins I), “Use of Alcaligenes eutrophus as a Source of Genes for                                                
                 2,4-D Resistance in Plants,” 35 Weed Science Suppl 1, 12-18 (1987).                                                                    
                 B. Frantz et al. (Frantz), “Organization and Nucleotide Sequence Determination of a Gene                                               
                 Cluster Involved in 3-Chlorocatechol Degradation,” 84 PNAS 4460-64 (1987).                                                             
                 E.J. Perkins (Perkins II), Dissertation entitled “The Molecular Biology of the Halogenated                                             
                 Aromatic Catabolic Plasmid PJP4,” Washington State University, UMI Dissertation                                                        
                 Information Services No. 8813086 (1987).                                                                                               
                          The claims stand rejected as follows:                                                                                         
                          I.  Claims 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, and 12 through 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,                                          
                 as based on an inadequate written description and lack of enablement.                                                                  
                          II.  Claims 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, and 12 through 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,                                         
                 based on scope of enablement.                                                                                                          
                          III.  Claims 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 12 through 17 and 19 through 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                         
                 unpatentable over Stalker, Olsen, Zukowski, Frantz, Perkins I and Perkins II.                                                          
                          IV.  Claim 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Stalker, Olsen, Zukowski,                                            
                 Frantz, Perkins I, Perkins II and Fillatti.                                                                                            
                          V.  Claims 23 through 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Stalker,                                                  
                 Olsen, Zukowski, Frantz, Perkins I and Perkins II and Don.                                                                             
                          VI.  Claims 22 through 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as dependent                                               
                 upon a canceled base claim.                                                                                                            




                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007