Ex parte DAHLERUD - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-3290                                                          
          Application 08/062,156                                                      


               providing a logical block counter;                                     
               providing in memory a block map formed as an information               
          table defining a plurality of entry points corresponding to a               
          plurality of entry point intervals to be defined, for each                  
          entry point said block map defining its location on the tape                
          in terms of said categorizing marks and a logical block                     
          number; and                                                                 
               upon receiving a command to locate said desired logical                
          block, checking said block map to determine a closest entry                 
          point which directly precedes the desired logical block to be               
          located, using the categorizing mark counter to locate said                 
          nearest entry point, and then without any further referral to               
          another block map serially reading the logical blocks directly              
          following the entry point in order to count each logical block              
          which is traversed, and incrementing the logical block counter              
          until it reaches said logical block number of said desired                  
          logical data block.                                                         

          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Klumpp et al. (Klumpp)        4,472,750          Sep. 18, 1984              
          Usui                          4,656,535          Apr. 07, 1987              
          Hood et al. (Hood)            4,747,126           May  24,                  
          1988                                                                        
          Osterlund                     4,775,969          Oct. 04, 1988              
          Claims 1-5, 7 and 9-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                       
          § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner offers                     
          Klumpp in view of Osterlund with respect to claims 7, 9 and                 
          11-15, and adds Usui with respect to claims 1-5 and 10.                     





                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007