THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOACHIM SUESS and GERHARD ZINNER
____________
Appeal No. 95-3303
Application No. 07/960,8921
____________
HEARD: April 9, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 11 and 13-21. Claim 12 stands
withdrawn from further consideration and appellants have
withdrawn the appeal of claim 11. See the brief at page 1.
Claim 13 is representative and is reproduced below:
1Application for patent filed October 14, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007