Ex parte LYNN et al. - Page 1




                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                      
                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                      
                      today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                        
                      journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                           
                      Board.                                                                                                    
                                                                                              Paper No. 15                      
                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                      ____________                                                              
                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                      ____________                                                              
                       Ex parte SHELBY A. LYNN, EDWARD L. RYAN III, DONALD R.                                                   
                                            MOWERTON and LORI ANN COOK                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                              
                                                  Appeal No. 95-3453                                                            
                                            Application No. 08/125,7091                                                         
                                                      ____________                                                              
                                                HEARD: March 8, 1999                                                            
                                                      ____________                                                              
               Before PAK, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
               PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                


                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final                                                 
               rejection of claims 1 through 8, which are all of the claims                                                     
               pending in the application.                                                                                      



                      1Application for patent filed September 23, 1993.                                                         
               According to the appellants, the application is a division of                                                    
               Application No. 07/914,324, filed July 17, 1992, now Patent                                                      
               No. 5,248,196.                                                                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007