THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TSUNG-MIN HUS and
TUNG F. CHEN
__________
Appeal No. 95-3461
Application 08/056,0761
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and WINTERS and WILLIAM F.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 15 and 29
through 41, all the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed April 30, 1993. According to appellants, this
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/956,635, filed October 5, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007