THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 99
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HIDEKUNI ODA, TATUO KINOSHITA
and AKIYOSHI SHIMUZU
________________
Appeal No. 95-3484
Application 08/098,2361
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed July 29, 1993. According to appellants,
the application is a continuation of Application 07/813,043, filed December
23, 1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/567,709,
filed August 14, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application
07/364,535, filed June 12, 1989, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
Application 07/220,954, filed June 23, 1988, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application 06/885,399, filed July 18, 1986, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 06/770,019, filed August 29, 1985, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 06/553,873, filed November
21, 1983, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 06/338,138,
filed January 8, 1982, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007