Ex parte IGARASHI et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1995-3499                                                                                          
              Application No. 07/757,342                                                                                    
                     Claims 1 and 13 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows:                  
                     1.      An isolated human luteinizing hormone-human chorionic gonadotropin                             
              receptor protein, in which said isolated protein has an amino acid sequence represented                       
              by (i) SEQ ID NO:2, an amino acid sequence having the 1st to 699th amino acid residues                        
              of SEQ ID NO: 1, or (ii) by SEQ ID NO:7, an amino acid sequence lacking the 227th to                          
              289th amino acid residues of SEQ ID NO: 2.                                                                    

                     13.     A pharmaceutical composition comprising an effective amount of an isolated                     
              human luteinizing hormone-human chorionic gonadotropin receptor protein and a                                 
              pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or vehicle.                                                               

                     The reference relied upon by the examiner is:                                                          
              Rosemblit et al. (Rosemblit), “Characterization of an Antiserum to the Rat Luteal                             
              Luteinizing Hormone/Chorionic Gonadotropin Receptor”, Endocrinology, Vol. 123, No.                            
              5, pp. 2284-2290 (May 1998)                                                                                   

                     Claims 1, 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35 USC § 103 over Rosemblit.                                  
                     We have carefully considered the respective positions of the appellants and the                        
              examiner and find ourselves in substantial agreement with that of the appellants.                             
              Accordingly, we reverse.                                                                                      
                     As we understand it, the examiner’s overall position is that since the rat luteinizing                 
              hormone-human chorionic gonadotropin (LH/GH) receptor was purified from                                       
              rat luteal tissue, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to isolate the              
              human receptor protein (LH/hCG) because “the commercial value of a protein or protein                         
              related product lies in its utility in human subjects.”  Answer, p. 4.  However, in reviewing                 
              the Rosemblit reference relied upon by the examiner, it is difficult to discern on what basis                 

                                                             2                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007