Ex parte HOBSON - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-3566                                                          
          Application No. 07/950,802                                                  


          Abanaki Corporation Literature, "Oil Skimmers" (1989)                       
               Appellant's claimed invention is directed to an apparatus              
          and process for skimming oil from the surface of a body of                  
          water.  The apparatus is transportable and comprises a tail                 
          pulley that is immersed in the body of water which transports               
          an endless belt that removes oil from the surface of the                    
          water.  According to appellant,                                             
               [F]or the first time in such a transportable unit,                     
               tension of the belt when in proper use is provided                     
               solely by the weight of the tail pulley and the belt                   
               itself.  This weight tensioning is accomplished by                     
               mounted [sic, mounting] the pulley such that is has                    
               an ability to float freely relative to the skimmer's                   
               stabilizer bar within a range of movement (paragraph                   
               bridging pages 2 and 3 of Brief).                                      
               Appealed claims 1-7, 16, 18 and 20 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.  Claims 1-7 and 18 stand                 
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.  Claims 1-3,               
          5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) or, in the                  
          alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over               
          Abanaki.  The appealed claims also stand rejected under                     
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:                                                 
               (1) claim 4 over Abanaki;                                              
               (2) claim 16 over Combrowski;                                          
               (3) claims 8-11 over Abanaki in view of Spurr;                         
                                         -3-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007