Ex parte QUINONES et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 95-3870                                                                                       
              Application 07/993,551                                                                                   

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL2                                                      
                     This is an appeal under § 134 from the examiner's decision refusing to allow claims               
              1 through 41, all the claims in the application.  Claims 1 and 40 are illustrative of the                
              subject matter on appeal and read as follows:                                                            
                     1.   A process for making small diameter skinless frankfurters comprising:                        
                     a)  deshirring casing from a shirred stick of moisture and smoke permeable food                   
              casing adapted for use in stuffing and processing sausages, said casing comprising:                      
                     an elongated tube adjacent first and second longitudinal portions wherein at least                
              one colorant or opacifier is dispersed in at least one of said portions of said tube to                  
              provide it with optical values which are different from the other portion, and wherein the               
              second portion has a transverse width less than that for said first portion and said first and           
              second portions have L, a, b, and opacity values as measured by colorimeter using the                    
              Hunter color scale meeting at least one of the following conditions:                                     
                            i) an average opacity value of said first portion that is at least about 0.5%              
              units greater than the average opacity value of said second portion;                                     
                            ii) a difference in average opacity between said first portion and said                    
              second portion which is less than 10, and a difference between said first and second                     
              portion in their respective averages of either said L values or said a values or said b                  
              values of at least about 5; or                                                                           
                            iii) a difference of at least about 10 or greater in average opacity between               
              said first portion and said second portion, and the sum of the absolute values of a and b of             
              the first portion following extraction of said casing with water and methanol is at least 10;            
              and                                                                                                      
                     wherein said tube has a tube wall thickness less than about 2.0 mils and a tube                   
              circumference less than 15 mm with said second longitudinal portion having an opacity of                 
              less than about 5.0% and a transverse width of at least about 3/16 inch;                                 


                     2This application is a division of Application 07/898,373, Appeal No. 96-1992.  We have           
              considered the two appeals together.                                                                     
                                                           2                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007