Ex parte AYACHE - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-3920                                                          
          Application No. 08/151,938                                                  


               The invention is directed to a variable frequency clock                
          for an electronic system.  More particularly, the frequency of              
          a system clock is reduced when a microprocessor has been idle               
          for a predetermined time in order to decrease power                         
          dissipation.                                                                
               Representative independent method claim 8 is reproduced                
          as follows:                                                                 


               8.   A method of reducing power dissipated by an                       
          electronic system, comprising the steps of:                                 
               monitoring a component of said system for a change in an               
          output thereof from a logic “1" to logic “0" or vice versa;                 
          and                                                                         
               reducing the frequency of a clock of said system when                  
          said output is constant for a predetermined interval of time.               

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       

          Carter et al. (Carter)        4,980,836                Dec. 25,             
          1990                                                                        
          Watts, Jr. et al. (Watts)     5,218,704                Jun.  8,             
          1993                                                                        

               Claims 1, 3 and 8 through 10 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. 102(e) as anticipated by Watts.  Additionally, claims 1              
          through 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as unpatentable               
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007