THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HELMUT BAHRMANN, GREGOR DECKERS, WOLFGANG GREB,
PETER HEYMANNS, PETER LAPPE, THOMAS MULLER,
JURGEN SZAMEITAT and ERNST WIEBUS
__________
Appeal No. 95-3931
Application 08/163,0861
___________
HEARD: January 12, 1999
___________
Before WEIFFENBACH, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1-11, which are all of the claims in the application. We affirm the examiner’s rejection, but for reasons
Application for patent filed December 7, 1993.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007