THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MURRAY O. MEETZE
______________
Appeal No. 95-4014
Application 08/128,9291
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 36 through 53. 2
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we
cannot sustain any of the grounds of rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 maintained on appeal by the
1Application for patent filed September 29, 1993. According to appellant, this application is a division
of application 07/808,241, filed December 16, 1991, now abandoned.
2See the amendment of September 29, 1993 (Paper No. 2) and the amendment of April 29, 1994
(Paper No. 5).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007