THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RONALD S. BLOUGH, JERARD B. HOAGE
and LARRY A. MESSER
__________
Appeal No. 95-4025
Application 07/996,9681
___________
HEARD: February 12, 1999
___________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
1Application for patent filed December 23, 1992.
According to the appellants, the application is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/969,001, filed October
30, 1992; which is a division of Application 07/687,373, filed
April 18, 1991, now Patent 5,194,144, issued March 16, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007