THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MYRA A. HOSHOWSKI ____________ Appeal No. 1995-4072 Application No. 08/105,0081 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, WALTZ and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 2, 4 through 22, 24 through 32 and 34 through 1Application for patent filed August 11, 1993. According to the appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/950,825, filed September 24, 1992, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007