Appeal No. 95-4091
Application No. 08/106,742
THE REFERENCE OF RECORD
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the
following reference of record.
Sato et al. (Sato) 4,452,840 Jun. 5, 1984
THE REJECTION
Claims 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Sato.
OPINION
As a preliminary matter, appellant has stated that claims
6 and 7 stand or fall together. See 37 CFR
§1.192(c)(5)(1993). See appellant’s Brief, page 4. Our
opinion will focus on a specific limitation of the claimed
subject matter shared by both claims and dispositive of this
appeal.
We have carefully considered all of the argument
advanced by the appellant and the examiner and agree with
appellant that the aforementioned rejection is not well
founded. Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection.
The claimed subject matter before us is drawn to a
method which provides, “a prelaminate capable of transmitting
at least 85% of light incident thereon.” See claim 6. The
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007