THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN W. FRANK and CHARLES A. MATHNA
____________
Appeal No. 95-4120
Application No. 07/943,9011
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants seek review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-5 and 9-16, all of the pending
claims.
1Application for patent filed September 11, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007