THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS F. STECKEL
____________
Appeal No. 1995-4122
Application No. 08/067,6471
____________
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
1Application for patent filed May 26, 1993. According to
appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/740,399, filed August 5, 1991, now U.S. Patent No.
5,242,608, issued September 7, 1993; which is a continuation
of Application No. 07/564,669, filed August 7, 1990, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,064,545, issued November 12, 1991; which is
continuation of Application No. 06/943,297, filed December 17,
1986, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007