THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PETER S. VOGEL
____________
Appeal No. 95-4150
Application No. 08/102,5071
____________
HEARD: December 10, 1998
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 15-
16, 25-29, 36 and 45. The other remaining claims (Claims 17-
1Application for patent filed August 5, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/841,296 filed February 28, 1992, which is a
continuation of Application 07/582,878 filed October 12, 1990,
both abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007