Ex parte GLOVER - Page 1




                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               

                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was                                                                                     
                                not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding                                                                                    
                                precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                         Paper No. 13                                  
                                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                              
                                                                               ____________                                                                                            
                                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                             
                                                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                            
                                                                               ____________                                                                                            
                                                                  Ex parte DAVID A. GLOVER                                                                                             
                                                                               ____________                                                                                            
                                                                         Appeal No. 95-4250                                                                                            
                                                                Application No. 08/086,3951                                                                                            
                                                                               ____________                                                                                            
                                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                                           
                                                                               ____________                                                                                            
                     Before WILLIAM SMITH, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent                                                                                                     
                     Judges.                                                                                                                                                           
                     KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                               




                                                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                            

                                This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal                                                                                               
                     to allow claims 1, 3-5, 7-9, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, and 21-24 as                                                                                                     
                     amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment                                                                                                      


                                1Application for patent filed July 6, 1993.                                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007