Appeal No. 95-4298 Application No. 07/886,263 This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 1, 3 through 9 and 11 through 20, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. Claim 1, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows: 1. An analytical element useful for the determination of prostatic acid phosphatase in an aqueous specimen comprising: a porous spreading zone containing (a) a nonhygroscopic aromatic phosphate which reacts as a substrate with prostatic acid phosphatase to produce a phenol reaction product, said nonhygroscopic aromatic phosphate substrate being an alkaline earth salt of an aryl phosphate ester, and (b) a diazonium or tetrazolium salt which is capable of reacting with said phenol reaction product to provide a chromophore, said element further comprising a buffer which maintains said element at a pH of from about 3 to about 6.5 when contacted with an aqueous specimen. The references relied on by the examiner are: Schnabel et al. (Schnabel) 4,758,508 Jul. 19, 1988 Katsuyama 63-88000 Apr. 19, 1988 (Japanese Kokai patent application) Marie Pernicova, "Proof of Prostatic Acid Phosphtase Activity in Gel Carriers," Scripta Medica 259-64 (1971) -2-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007