THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in
a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NILES R. ROSENQUIST and ANGELIKA H. CLARK
____________
Appeal No. 95-4300
Application No. 08/165,5651
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS, GRON, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-13 and
15-17. Independent claims 1 and 15 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and
are appended to this decision.
1Application for patent filed December 10, 1993. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/957,495, filed October 7, 1992, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007