THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHEL BEUROTTE and PIERRE DE LA FARGE
____________
Appeal No. 95-4314
Application No. 07/963,5241
____________
HEARD: February 8, 1999
____________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 12-20, which are all of the claims pending
in this application.
1Application for patent filed October 20, 1992.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/606,199 filed October 31, 1990, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007