Ex parte DEETZ et al. - Page 1




                                   THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                      

                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
                                                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                             
                                                                                                          Paper No. 18               

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                            ____________                                                             

                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                            ____________                                                             

                                     Ex parte DAVID W. DEETZ and RUSSELL L. MORRIS                                                   
                                                            ____________                                                             

                                                        Appeal No. 1995-4405                                                         
                                                     Application No. 08/083,6801                                                     
                                                            ____________                                                             

                                                              ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                            ____________                                                             

               Before DOWNEY, WALTZ, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 



                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             

                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims              

               26 through 30, which are all of the claims pending in this application.  Claim 26 is illustrative:                    

                               26.  A method of controlling a concentration of a gaseous species of interest in                      
                       a reference medium as a predetermined function of temperature throughout a selected                           
                       temperature range comprising the steps of:                                                                    

                       1Application for patent filed June 25, 1993.  According to appellants, this application is a continuation of  
               Application 07/806,495, filed December 13, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,223,433, issued June 29, 1993.                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007