Ex parte MILNER - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1995-4434                                                        
          Application No. 07/988,023                                                  

               This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision                     
          rejecting claim 1.  Claims 3 through 15, which are the only                 
          other claims remaining in the application, stand allowed.                   
               Claim 1 reads as follows:                                              
               1.  An aqueous peritoneal dialysis composition sterile                 
          and free from pyrogens which is used for introduction into the              
          abdominal cavity for removal of water and waste products by                 
          dialysis across the peritoneal membrane comprising a water                  
          soluble glucose polymer mixture derived from the hydrolysis of              
          starch containing at least 36.7% by weight of glucose polymers              
          having a degree of polymerization (D.P.) of more than 12                    
          glucose units, said glucose polymer mixture being present in                
          the peritoneal dialysis composition as an osmotic agent and                 
          said peritoneal dialysis composition having an osmolality of                
          about 265 to 378 mOsm/kg.  [Emphasis added].                                
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Silk et al. (Silk)         WO 82/03329              Oct. 14, 1982           
          (International patent application)                                          
               The issue presented for review is whether the examiner                 
          erred in rejecting claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                         
          unpatentable over Silk.                                                     
               On consideration of the record, we shall not sustain this              
          rejection.                                                                  
                                      DISCUSSION                                      
               We first invite attention to parent Application No.                    
          07/335,750 filed April 10, 1989 (Paper No. 15), where another               



                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007