THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES A. WOFFORD and STEVE C. JAMES
____________
Appeal No. 95-4450
Application No. 07/949,6761
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CAROFF, GARRIS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s refusal
to allow claims 23-33, 35 and 36. Claim 34 has been canceled.
Claims 1-22, which are the only other claims remaining in the
application, have been withdrawn from consideration by the
1Application for patent filed September 21, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007