THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NAOMI IIDA and SAKUYUKI ONISHI
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4466
Application 08/135,1881
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claim 18, which is
the only claim pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed October 12, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of application 07/548,691, filed July 5, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007