THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GARY E. STRIKER, LILIANE J. STRIKER
and EMMANUEL PETEN
____________
Appeal No. 95-4471
Application No. 07/963,4751
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 - 16, which are all of the claims pending in this application. An
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of claim 1, which is
reproduced below:
1Application for patent filed October 20, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007