Ex parte ABE - Page 3





                Appeal No. 95-4632                                                                                                            
                Application No. 08/184,675                                                                                                    



                         Nonaka et al.  (Nonaka)                  4,920,093                         Apr. 24, 1990                             

                         Chen et al.  (Chen)                      5,072,035                         Dec. 10, 1991                             

                         Matsuki et al.  (Matsuki)  2             1-260870                          Oct. 18, 1989                             
                         (Japanese Kokai)                                                                                                     

                         Vest et al., (Vest) "Synthesis of Metallo-Organic Compounds for MOD Powders and Films,"                              
                MRS Proceedings, Symposium L, Boston, MA, Dec. 2-4, 1985, pages 1-10.                                                         



                                                                  ISSUES3                                                                     

                         The issues presented for review are: (1) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 1, 2, 6-                     

                9 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Pebler in view of Vest and Chen, (2)                                

                whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 3-4, 10, 11, 13, 15 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                            

                being unpatentable over Pebler in view of Vest and Chen as applied to claims 1, 2, 6-9 and 14 above,                          

                and further in view of Nanao, and (3) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 5 and 12 under 35                        





                         2Our consideration of this reference is based on an English translation thereof, a copy of which is provided         
                to appellant with this decision.                                                                                              
                         3The final rejection of (i) claims 1, 2, 6-9 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Pebler in view of     
                Vest, (ii) claims 3, 4, 10, 11, 13 and 15-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Pebler in view of Vest and further    
                in view of Nanao, and (iii) claims 5 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Pebler in view of Vest and             
                further in view of Matsuki and Nonaka does not appear in the examiner's answer and the examiner has not indicated             
                the status of these rejections.  Accordingly, the rejections are assumed to have been withdrawn.  Ex parte Emm, 118           
                USPQ 180, 181 (Bd. App. 1957).                                                                                                
                         Although Chen was not relied on in the final rejections of claim 1-18, appellant not only presumed that Chen         
                should have been relied on but also fully addressed Chen in the Brief as to each of the three "ISSUES" above (see             
                pages 5-11).  Consequently, there appears to be no prejudice to appellant in deciding the appeal on this record.              
                                                                   Page 3                                                                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007