THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES H. BEECH, Jr., DOUGLAS MILLER, JORGE L. SOTO,
JAMES A. STOOS and ALBERT H. WU
____________
Appeal No. 95-4665
Application No. 08/101,1111
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 3 as amended
after the final rejection (see the amendment dated Oct. 20,
1994, Paper No. 7, and the Advisory Action dated Nov. 17,
1Application for patent filed August 2, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007