Ex parte GYBIN et al. - Page 5




               Appeal No. 95-4723                                                                                                  
               Application No. 08/028,420                                                                                          

                       The rejection is reversed.                                                                                  

                                                       OTHER MATTERS                                                               

                       Appellants should consider whether the phrase “or quaternizable” should be deleted from claim               

               31, line 12 since claim 31, step (a) requires the presence of a  “quaternary” nitrogen atom.                        

                                                         CONCLUSION                                                                

                       The examiner’s decision to reject claims 23 through 38 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                       

               unpatentable over Ichimura is reversed.                                                                             


























                                                              Page 5                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007