Appeal No. 95-4723 Application No. 08/028,420 The rejection is reversed. OTHER MATTERS Appellants should consider whether the phrase “or quaternizable” should be deleted from claim 31, line 12 since claim 31, step (a) requires the presence of a “quaternary” nitrogen atom. CONCLUSION The examiner’s decision to reject claims 23 through 38 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ichimura is reversed. Page 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007