THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KANAKO IDA and SHINICHI YACHIGO
____________
Appeal No. 95-4754
Application No. 08/111,9051
____________
HEARD: April 5, 1999
____________
Before OWENS, WALTZ and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 2 through 7. These are all of the claims
remaining in the application.
THE INVENTION
1Application for patent filed August 26, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007