THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KAJ HENRICSON ____________ Appeal No. 1995-4804 Application No. 07/861,3871 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 15. Claims 16 through 21 stand 1Application for patent filed March 31, 1992. According to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/839,389, filed February 21, 1992.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007