Ex parte MILLER et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 95-4838                                                          
          Application No. 08/131,643                                                  


                                      DECISION                                        
               The rejection of claims 1 through 7, 10 through 15, 20                 
          and 21 as unpatentable over Figure 1 in view of Yeh or Kito is              
          affirmed.                                                                   
               The rejection of claims 8, 16, 18 and 19 as unpatentable               
          over Figure 1 in view of Yeh or Kito is reversed.                           
               The rejection of claims 9, 17 and 22 as unpatentable over              
          Figure 1 in view of Yeh or Kito and further in view of Howard,              
          Diachuk or Buelt is reversed.                                               





















                                         12                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007