THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PAUL S. FURMANEK, DAVID A. GLASSCOCK, MICHAEL KEANE
JR., BARRY A. MAHLER and V.N. MALLIKARJUANA
____________
Appeal No. 1995-4855
Application No. 08/146,3341
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Pursuant to the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.197(b)(amended
Dec. 1, 1997), appellants have submitted a request for
rehearing (hereafter “Request”) of our decision dated Aug. 18,
1Application for patent filed November 1, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007