THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YOSHIHARU INABA, HIDEO NAITO and
KIKUO WATANABE
____________
Appeal No. 95-4878
Application No. 08/225,0871
____________
HEARD: April 8, 1999
____________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed March 8, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/817,956, filed January 8, 1992, which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/457,779, filed January 11,
1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007