THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HIDEYUKI MURAKAMI,
YUSAKU URYU, AKIRA HORI,
YASUHIRO MATSUO, and RYUICHI EDASAKI
__________
Appeal No. 95-4919
Application 08/096,5161
__________
HEARD: Apr. 7, 1999
__________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, JOHN D. SMITH, and GARRIS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1 through 8 which are all of the claims in the
1Application for patent filed July 23, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007