THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte STEVEN P. CHRISTIANO, GREGORY G. BAUSCH,
LAUREN M. TONGE, SHARON K. McCOY, ELIZABETH F. MALLEN,
ROGER J. JONES, ATHANASIOS SURUTZIDIS and ANDREW A. FISK
________________
Appeal No. 95-4939
Application No. 08/096,3451
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-
15, 18-28, 31-41 and 44, all the claims remaining in the
present application. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1Application for patent filed July 22, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007