THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte EDWARD J. WOO and DAVID R. BOSTON ____________ Appeal No. 95-5115 Application No. 08/091,9991 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, WARREN and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1, 4 through 6, 8, 9, 11 through 13 and 15 . The only other 2 1Application for patent filed July 15, 1993. 2Claims 11 and 12 at least ultimately depend from now cancelled claim 10. This informality should be corrected in (continued...)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007