THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN F. HOPE
____________
Appeal No. 95-5125
Application No. 07/891,3001
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HANLON, PAK and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 4, 8, 9, 13 through 18, 23 through 25, 33
1Application for patent filed May 29, 1992. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/767,466 filed September 30, 1991, now
abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
07/572,253 filed August 27, 1990, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007