THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DIRK NEMEGEER and YVES VANCRAEYNEST
____________
Appeal No. 96-0002
Application No. 07/860,5231
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 2, 3, and 21-24, all the claims
remaining in this application. Representative claim 21 is
reproduced below:
1Application for patent filed April 1, 1992. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/523,524, filed May 15, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007