Ex parte NEMEGEER et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        
                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                Paper No. 28                            
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                   Ex parte DIRK NEMEGEER and YVES VANCRAEYNEST                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 96-0002                                                                           
                                                    Application No. 07/860,5231                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and KRATZ, Administrative Patent                                                                             
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            



                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                                                        
                 final rejection of claims 2, 3, and 21-24, all the claims                                                                              
                 remaining in this application.  Representative claim 21 is                                                                             
                 reproduced below:                                                                                                                      

                          1Application for patent filed April 1, 1992.  According                                                                       
                 to the appellants, the application is a continuation of                                                                                
                 Application No. 07/523,524, filed May 15, 1990.                                                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007