THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 39 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte EDWIN SEUBERT and DIETER SOHN ____________ Appeal No. 96-0011 Application No. 07/993,8961 ____________ HEARD: May 6, 1999 ____________ Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 3 through 7 as amended under 37 C.F.R. § 116 after the final rejection. See the amendment dated July 5, 1994, paper No. 20 and the advisory action dated July 15, 1994. 1Application for patent filed December 18,1992.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007