Appeal No. 96-0088 Application No. 08/038,426 claimed subject matter is clearly disclosed by patentee at column 6, lines 36-45. Appellants argue that the catalysts are carried in the air into the combustion chamber and thus are not even gasoline additives. See Brief, pages 21-22. Appellants’ arguments are unpersuasive. Claim 1 requires only a gasoline additive. When the gasoline and additive are mixed, or even if they are mixed, is irrelevant to the “gasoline additive” claimed subject matter. As for claims 16 and 23, we find that the disclosure at column 6, lines 23-26, which mixes the air, fuel and catalyst in the manifold to produce a homogenous blend of the catalyst with the fuel and air, meets both the requirements of the fuel composition of claim 16 and the limitation of “dissolving at least a portion of said additive in gasoline” and “feeding the gasoline having said additive dissolved therein to the internal combustion engine,” as required by claim 23. Based upon these findings,3 3 Hackh’s Chemical Dictionary, defines solution as,“the mixing of a solid, liquid or gaseous substance (solute) with a liquid (the solvent), forming a homogenous mixture....” Julius Grant ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, fourth edition, page 624, 1972. 16Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007