THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HANS REICHENECKER
____________
Appeal No. 96-0114
Application No. 08/128,2791
____________
HEARD: June 8, 1999
____________
Before KIMLIN, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed September 29, 1993.1
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/615,170, filed November 19, 1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007