THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHIUNA-HUEI SHIEH, KENNETH W. BABCOCK,
GINO PANCIROLI, JOHN M. BRANAN and
ROSCOE W. TAYLOR
____________
Appeal No. 96-0150
Application No. 07/969,2441
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed February 12, 1993.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-
part of Application No. 07/574,046, filed August 29, 1990, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007