THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte BERT B. MILES
and GARY W. SAMS
______________
Appeal No. 96-0172
Application 08/076,0001
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WARREN, WALTZ and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 12 through 14, 16 and 17.2
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we cannot
sustain any of the grounds of rejection of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, each of which is
1 Application for patent filed June 11, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a division of
application 07/604,925, filed October 29, 1990, now United States Patent 5,221,523, issued June 22,
1993.
2 Amendment of April 4, 1994 (Paper No. 5).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007